RATE AND CAUSES OF INPATIENT BLOOD SAMPLE REJECTION AT PHUC HUNG HOSPITAL
Keywords:
Specimen rejection, Pre-analytical errors, Hemolysis, Quality controlAbstract
Background: Specimen quality and preanalytical errors have a substantial impact on diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. Analysis of specimen rejection rates and underlying causes, particularly among inpatients, provides an essential basis for improving patient care quality. Objectives: To determine the rejection rate of inpatient blood specimens, identify the main causes of rejection, and analyze associated factors. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 30,406 blood specimens collected from inpatient departments at Phuc Hung Hospital between January and June 2025. Causes of specimen rejection were classified according to CLSI GP33A guidelines (hemolysis, clotting, incorrect volume, incorrect patient information, etc.). Results: A total of 104 out of 30,406 specimens were rejected, corresponding to a rejection rate of 0.34%. The Emergency and Intensive Care-Toxicology Department accounted for the highest proportion of rejected specimens (43.18%). The most common causes were hemolysis (25.0%) and incorrect patient information (18.27%). The Pediatrics Department had a six-fold higher risk of specimen rejection compared with the General Internal Medicine Department. Conclusions: Specimen rejection rates were concentrated in Emergency and Intensive Care-Toxicology Department, with hemolysis and administrative information errors as the predominant causes. The highest risk of rejection is in the Pediatrics department. Enhanced training in blood collection and specimen handling for nursing staff is necessary to minimize preanalytical errors and improve overall laboratory testing quality.
References
1. Giuseppe Lippi, Becan-McBride K, Behúlová D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(1):229-241. DOI:10.1515/cclm-2012-0597.
2. Getawa S, Aynalem M, Melku M, Adane T. Blood specimen rejection rate in clinical laboratory: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pract Lab Med. 2023;33:e00303. DOI:10.1016/j.plabm.2023.e00303.
3. Phelan MP, Reineks EZ, Schold JD, Hustey FM, Chamberlin J, Procop GW. Preanalytic factors associated with hemolysis in emergency department blood samples. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(2):229-235. DOI:10.5858/arpa.2016-0609-OA.
4. Lippi G, Betsou F, Cadamuro J, et al. Preanalytical challenges – time for solutions. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(7):974-981. doi:10.1515/cclm-2018-1334.
5. Calleja R, Mielke N, Lee R, Johnson S, Bahl A. Hemolyzed laboratory specimens in the emergency department: an underappreciated, but frequent problem. J Emerg Nurs. 2023;49(5):744-754.
6. Iqbal MS, Tabassum A, Arbaeen AF, Qasem AH, Elshemi AG, Almasmoum H. Preanalytical errors in a hematology laboratory: an experience from a tertiary care center. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(4):591. DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13040591
7. Kani V, Kannan K, Arumugam S, Sonti S. Preanalytical errors in hematology: insights from a tertiary care hospital. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e69641. DOI:10.7759/cureus.69641
8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Procedures for the Collection of Diagnostic Blood Specimens by Venipuncture. 7th ed. CLSI guideline GP41. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2020.
9. Şenol Ş. Preanalytical errors in pediatric blood sampling: a systematic review of common challenges and risks. Turk J Biochem. 2024;49(1):55-62. DOI:10.1515/tjb-2024-0196
10. Trần Thanh Lâm, Bùi Văn Thắng, Dương Thị Hiền và cộng sự. Thực trạng từ chối mẫu bệnh phẩm xét nghiệm tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa Quốc tế Vinmec Times City năm 2024. Tạp chí Y học Cộng đồng. 2025;66 (Số đặc biệt):257-262. DOI:10.52163/yhc.v66icd23.3945
11. Aquino JB, Damian KB. Pre-analytical factors influencing blood sample rejection rate in the hematology laboratory of the Philippine General Hospital from 2018 to 2022: a cross-sectional study. Acta Med Philipp. 2025;59(11):30-36. DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.9961
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Accuracy in patient and sample identification; approved guideline. CLSI document GP33-A. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2019.
13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 15189:2022 Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO; 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Đình Vũ Phạm (Tác giả)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.